Prepare the story queue
Add the stories, acceptance criteria, links, and any known constraints before asking for estimates. Missing context creates question-mark votes and avoidable churn.
FreeScrumPokerAsync scrum works when the team separates preparation from decision-making. Let people read, vote, and leave questions on their own time, then use live time only for disagreement, risk, and final estimate calls.
Async does not mean silent or unstructured. It means the meeting only starts after the low-value reading and first-pass voting are already done.
Add the stories, acceptance criteria, links, and any known constraints before asking for estimates. Missing context creates question-mark votes and avoidable churn.
Give participants a clear window to vote independently. Private pre-votes reduce anchoring and let quieter engineers record uncertainty before the group discussion begins.
When estimates cluster, record the final number quickly. When they diverge, discuss the highest and lowest reasoning before deciding whether to split, spike, or re-vote.
Live room chat keeps assumptions, questions, and follow-up risks beside the estimate. That matters when a story returns later and the team needs to remember why it was sized.
Do not turn async voting into a second full ceremony. Bring only unresolved stories into a call, and close obvious estimates without forcing everyone through a repeat discussion.
Save the final estimate, note the decision, and move the story back to the source workflow. The point of async scrum is less coordination drag, not less accountability.
Yes, if stories are prepared well and the team preserves private votes, questions, final estimates, and the decision trail.
Use live time for high-spread estimates, unclear scope, risk tradeoffs, and stories that need splitting before they can be planned responsibly.
FreeScrumPoker keeps story queues, signed-in votes, reveal/reset, chat, final estimates, and history together so distributed teams do not lose planning context.